Abstract
Textile Industry has spread all over the world, of whichfabric manufacture is the most important segment both in spread and variety. Efforts have been made to classify fabrics from different viewpoints, viz., Consumer,Trader, Manufacturer, Technologists, Engineers and Standards.
From Consumers viewpoints, fabrics are classified earlieras:
This classification is subsequently modified as:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
From the Traders viewpoint, fabrics are classifiedaccording to specific Trade/ Brand names. From the Manufacturers viewpoint,fabrics are classified according to the method of manufacture as: i) Woven a)Hand loom b) Power loom c) Khadi ii) Knitted a) Warp knit b) Weft knit iv)Embroidery v) Lace vi) Crochet, etc.
From the Technologists viewpoint, fabrics are classified as:i) Structure ii) Texture. From the Engineers viewpoint, fabrics are classifiedinto: i) Width/Breadth, ii) Length, iii) Yarn size, iv) Weight, v) Thickness,vi) Setting, vii) Face. From Standards viewpoint, fabrics are classified as i)Set, ii) Weight, iii) Strength, iv) Condition, v) Application or End use. Thereis the possibility of overlapping of fabric characteristics under thesedifferent viewpoints.
In the present paper, it is proposed to have a universally- acceptableclassification of fabrics based not on aesthetic characteristics which involvesubjective assessment, but on verifiable characteristics which involve thedetermination of the following characteristics:- i) Type/Variety, ii)Materials-used, iii) Weave, iv) Yarn Numbers (N1, N2,Na),v) Loom set a)Reed (R), b) Pick wheel (P), vi) Threads (n1, n2,T),vii) Width [Reed Width (RW), Cloth Width (B)], viii) Crimp % (c1, c2)ix) Diameter (d1, d2, β), x) Thickness (G), xi)Weight (W W′), xii) Cover Factors (K1, K2Kc, FQI), xiii) Weight Factors (w1, w2, w, w1/w2),xiv) Length/unit weight ( Y, Y′), xv) Effective Length/unit weightof fabric (BYT, BMT).
Based upon the above characteristics, it is possible to setup norms for the following characteristics under different groups i)FabricWeight (W, W′), ii) Average Count (Na), Setting (Warp, Weft, Fabric),iii) Face, iv) Fabric Thickness, v) Effective Length / unit weight of fabric(BYT, BMT), vi) Fabric Condition, vii) End use. Each fabric can be classifiedaccording to the above classification and certificate issued by an authorizedorganization. Illustrative examples are given to show how this classificationcan be implemented.
Among the three characteristics of Fabric Weight, Averagecount and Effective length/unit weight of fabric. Fabric weight is used in costcalculation and average count is used for levying excise and other duties. However;from Consumers viewpoint, costing of fabrics needs to be done based oneffective length/unit weight of fabric, since its value varies even for thesame fabric weight and fabrics are sold by length overwhelming and only incertain cases they are sold by weight. In Technical textiles there is absolutenecessity for proper classification of fabrics on functional basis.
Introduction
Textile Industry is next in importance to Agriculture, sinceit is the second largest provider of employment. It has spread far and wide inthe world, of which fabric manufacture occupies the most important segment inboth breadth and variety. From India the export of fabrics is estimated tofetch US $ 17 billion and export of readymade garments to fetch US $ 34 billionby 2011-12. There is severe competition among exporting countries to increasetheir share in the world market for textiles and apparels. In view of the appreciation of the value of Rupee against US $, it has become increasingly difficult to face thestiff competition among the exporting countries.
The present paper is confined to classification of fabrics.
Definition of fabric:
The term fabric is derived from the Latin term fabrica meaning fabric or workshop. It means that which is put together like fabric or building. In fabric engineering, fabric is defined as a flat material with length (L), Breadth (B), Thickness (G) and having weight. While volumetric density of fabric can be determined from these parameters, it is customary to evaluate the aerial density of fabric (W or W′) in terms of oz/sq, yd. or gsm.
Classification of Fabrics:
Fabrics may be classified in different ways, viz,
Utility:
(i) Apparel, (ii) Household (iii) Industrial, which is modified as:
(i) Apparel (a) Outer wear, (b) Inner wear, (c) Seasonal wear, (d) Staple wear, (e) Fancy wear.
Household (a) Bedding, (b) Home textiles.
Technical textiles (a) Mobile textiles, (b) Geo textiles, (c) Construction textiles, (d) Industrial textiles, (e) Medical textiles, (f) Safety textiles, (g) Smart or Intelligent textiles, (h) High-altitude textiles, (i) Mountaineering textiles, (j) Outer space textiles, (k) Military textiles, (l) Agriculture textiles, (m) Horticulture textiles, (n) Sericulture textiles, (o) Dairy textiles., (p) Fishery textiles, etc.
Method of manufacture as:
- Woven (a) Hand loom, (b) Power loom, (c) Khadi.
- Knitted (a) Hand knitted, (b) Machine knitted, (c) Wrap knits, (d) Weft knits.
- Embroidery (a) Hand embroidery, (b) Machine embroidery.
- Lace (a) Hand- made, (b) Machine- made.
- Braiding (a) Personal wear, (b) Industrial, (c) Oceanic.
- Crochet.
- Tatting.
- Knotting.
- Netting.
- Felting.
- No-weaving, etc.
Materials used as:
(i) Natural, (ii) Man-made, (iii) Blends.
4. Yarns used as:
(i) Filament (mono/multi), (ii) Spun
(single/folded/cable/fancy).
5. Fabric condition as:
(i) Grey/Greige / Loomstate, (ii) Finished: a) Scoured, b)
Bleached, c) Dyed, d) Printed, e) Mercerized, f) Stentered, g) Calendered, h)
Sanforized/Zero-Zero finished, i) Sized, j) Glazed, k) Etched/Embossed, l)
Felted, m) Raised, n) Sheared, o) Gassed/Singed, p) Fire-proofed, q)
Schreinered, r) Soil-resistant, s) Soil-release, t) Stain-resistant, u)
Anti-crease, etc.
6. Trade or Brand names such as:
(i) Poplin, (ii) Shirting, (iii) Cambric, (iv) Lawn, (v) Voile, (vi) Crepe, (vii) Jean, (viii) Denim, (ix) Gabardine, (x) Sheeting, (xi) Long cloth, (xii) Twill, (xiii) Drill, (xiv) Tussore, (xv) Mull, (xvi) Muslin, (xvii) Damask, (xviii) Brocade, (xix) Georgette, (xx) Satin, (xxi) Plain, (xxii) Flannel, (xxiii) Blanket, (xxiv) Rug, (xxv) Broadcloth, (xxvi) Duck, (xxvii) Canvas, (xxviii) Velvet, (xxix) Corduroy, (xxx) Toweling (xxxi) Turkish Toweling, etc.
7. From Technologists viewpoint as:
(i) Structure (a) Weave/Nature of interlacement, (b)
Knitting/Nature of interloping, etc. (ii) Texture/Nature of construction.
8. From Engineers viewpoint as:
(i) Breadth or width, (ii) Length, (iii) Yarn size, (iv) Setting: (a) Warp, (b) Weft, (v) Weight, (vi) Fabric Thickness, (vii) Fabric face, (viii) Fabric cover.
9. From Standards viewpoint as:
(i) Construction, (ii) Weight, (iii) Strength, (iv) Condition, (v) Application or End use.
It may be noted that there is the possibility of overlapping of characteristics under the different methods of classification of fabrics.
At present, customers are carried away by aesthetic sense involving look, colour, feel, etc. and, ultimately, cost of fabric.
In the present paper, intrinsic quality of fabric is emphasized, leading to durability. Accordingly, fabrics are classified under the following categories:
1. Fabric Weight
CLASS |
|
W (oz/ sq.yd) |
W' (gsm) |
|
|
|
|
LIGHT WEIGHT |
L1 |
<1 |
< 33.91 |
L2 |
1~2 |
33.91 ~ 67.8 |
|
L3 |
2~3 |
67.8 ~ 101.7 |
|
L4 |
3~4 |
101.7 ~ 135.6 |
|
MEDIUM WEIGHT |
M1 |
4~5 |
135.6 ~ 169.5 |
M2 |
5~6 |
169.5 ~ 203.4 |
|
M3 |
6~7 |
203.4 ~ 237.3 |
|
M4 |
7~8 |
237.3 ~ 271.2 |
|
HEAVY WEIGHT |
H1 |
8~9 |
271.2 ~ 305.2 |
H2 |
9~10 |
305.2 ~ 339.1 |
|
H3 |
10~11 |
339.1 ~ 373.0 |
|
H4 |
11~12 |
373.0 ~ 406.9 |
|
H5 |
>12 |
> 406.9 |
2. Average Count (Na)
CLASS |
|
COUNT (Ne) RANGE |
|
|
|
COARSE COUNT |
C1 |
< 4.29 |
C2 |
4.29 ~ 7.14 |
|
C3 |
7.14 ~ 10.71 |
|
C4 |
10.71 ~ 14.29 |
|
C5 |
14.29 ~ 17.86 |
|
MEDIUM COUNT |
M1 |
17.86 ~ 21.43 |
M2 |
21.43 ~ 25.00 |
|
M3 |
25.00 ~ 35.71 |
|
MEDIUM FINE COUNT |
MF1 |
35.71 ~ 47.62 |
MF2 |
47.62 ~ 59.52 |
|
FINE COUNT |
F1 |
59.52 ~ 71.43 |
F2 |
71.43 ~ 95.24 |
|
EXTRA FINE COUNT |
EF1 |
95.24 ~119.05 |
EF2 |
119.05~142.86 |
|
EF3 |
142.86~190.48 |
3. Cover Factor (K)
CLASS |
K RANGE |
|
|
TOO OPENLY SET |
< 5 |
OPENLY SET |
5 ~ 11 |
CLOSELY SET |
11 ~ 18 |
TOO CLOSELY SET |
> 18 |
4. Fabric Cover
CLASS |
Kc RANGE |
FQI RANGE |
|
|
|
TOO OPENLY SET |
< 0.3260 |
< 0.3111 |
OPENLY SET |
0.3260 ~ 0.6326 |
0.3111 ~ 0.6832 |
CLOSELY SET |
0.6326 ~ 0.8736 |
0.6832 ~ 1.1180 |
TOO CLOSELY SET |
> 0.8736 |
> 1.1180 |
5. Weight Factor Ratio (w1/w2)
CLASS |
w1/w2 RANGE |
|
|
WEFT FACED |
< 0.7656 |
APPROX. EQUAL FACED |
0.7656 ~ 1.2656 |
PERFECTLY EQUAL FACED |
1.0000 |
WARP FACED |
> 1.2656 |
6. Fabric Thickness
CLASS |
G (mils) |
G' (mm) |
|
|
|
THIN |
< 9.57 |
< 0.24 |
MEDIUM THICK |
9.57 ~ 17.37 |
0.24 ~ 0.44 |
THICK |
17.37 ~ 39.37 |
0.44 ~ 1.00 |
TOO THICK |
> 39.37 |
> 1.00 |
7. Effective Length/Unit Weight Of Fabric
GROUP |
BYT RANGE |
BMT RANGE |
|
|
|
1 |
Up to 3600 |
Up to 7260 |
2 |
3601 to 6000 |
7261 to 12099 |
3 |
6001 to 9000 |
12100 to 18148 |
4 |
9001 to 12000 |
18149 to 24196 |
5 |
12001 to 15000 |
24197 to 30245 |
6 |
15001 to 18000 |
30246 to 36294 |
7 |
18001 to 21000 |
36295 to 42343 |
8 |
21001 to 30000 |
42344 to 60490 |
9 |
30001 to 40000 |
60491 to 80653 |
10 |
40001 to 50000 |
80654 to 100816 |
11 |
50001 to 60000 |
100817 to 120978 |
12 |
60001 to 80000 |
120979 to 161304 |
13 |
80001 to 100000 |
161305 to 201630 |
14 |
100001 to 120000 |
201631 to 241956 |
15 |
120001 to 160000 |
241957 to 322606 |
Note: All the above factors can be evaluated using formulae given in the Appendix.
Six examples are given to illustrate how the proposed scheme of classification can be implemented, irrespective of material, weave, condition and/or end use of fabrics.
Sr. No. |
CHARACTERISTIC |
EXAMPLE (1) |
EXAMPLE (2) |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Variety |
Sheeting (26s ) |
Sheeting (26s ) |
2 |
Material |
Cotton X Cotton |
Cotton X Cotton |
3 |
Weave |
Plain |
Plain |
4 |
Warp yarn Number. (N1) |
21s (Ne) |
26s (Ne) |
5 |
Weft yarn Number. (N2) |
25s (Ne) |
26s (Ne) |
6 |
Average count (Na) |
23.3s (Ne) |
24.9s (Ne) |
7 |
Reed count( R ) |
40s (Stockport) |
42s (Stockport) |
8 |
Pick wheel (P) |
33 (Teeth) |
37 (Teeth) |
9 |
Ends / in. (n1) |
42 |
44 |
10 |
Picks / in. (n2) |
36 |
40 |
11 |
Threads / sq. in. (T) |
78 |
84 |
12 |
Warp crimp (c1) |
9.09% |
8.11% |
13 |
Weft crimp (c2) |
5.00% |
4.77% |
14 |
Reed width (RW) |
37.8 in |
37.7 in. |
15 |
Cloth width (B) |
36 in |
36 in. |
16 |
Warp yarn diameter (d1) |
7.63 mils |
7.31 mils |
17 |
Weft yarn diameter (d2) |
7.16 mils |
7.02 mils |
18 |
Beta ratio (d2/d1) |
0.94 |
0.96 |
19 |
Fabric Thickness (G) |
14.8 mils |
14.33 mils |
20 |
Fabric Weight (W) |
2.4648 oz/sq.yd. |
2.4642 oz/sq.yd. |
21 |
Fabric Weight (W1) |
83.6 gsm |
83.6 gsm |
22 |
Warp cover factor (K1) |
8.95 |
8.98 |
23 |
Weft cover factor (K2) |
7.2 |
7.84 |
24 |
Fabric cover (Kc) |
0.4957 |
0.5017 |
25 |
Fabric quality index (FQI) |
0.5121 |
0.5226 |
26 |
Warp weight factor (w1) |
1.91 |
1.83 |
27 |
Weft weight factor (w2) |
1.46 |
1.54 |
28 |
Cloth weight factor (W) |
0.733 |
0.7308 |
29 |
Weight factor ratio (w1/w2) |
1.33 |
1.19 |
30 |
Linear Yd./ lb (Y) |
6.49 |
6.49 |
31 |
Effective yd/lb (BYT) |
18227 |
19635 |
Classification |
|||
1 |
Fabric weight class |
Light (L2) |
Light (L2) |
2 |
Average count class |
Medium (M1) |
Medium (M2) |
3 |
Warp setting class |
open |
open |
4 |
Weft setting class |
open |
open |
5 |
Fabric setting class |
open |
open |
6 |
Fabric face class |
warp |
equal |
7 |
Fabric thickness class |
Medium Thick |
Medium Thick |
8 |
Fabric group |
7 |
7 |
9 |
Fabric condition |
Grey |
Grey |
Sr. No. |
CHARACTERISTIC |
EXAMPLE (3) |
EXAMPLE (4) |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Variety |
Sheeting (26s ) |
Sheeting (26s ) |
2 |
Material |
Cotton X Cotton |
Cotton X Cotton |
3 |
Weave |
Plain |
Plain |
4 |
Warp yarn Number. (N1) |
24s (Ne) |
22s (Ne) |
5 |
Weft yarn Number. (N2) |
24s (Ne) |
26s (Ne) |
6 |
Average count (Na) |
24s (Ne) |
23.7s (Ne) |
7 |
Reed count( R ) |
52s (Stockport) |
40s (Stockport) |
8 |
Pick wheel (P) |
51 (Teeth) |
35 (Teeth) |
9 |
Ends / in. (n1) |
58 |
44 |
10 |
Picks / in. (n2) |
56 |
38 |
11 |
Threads / sq. in. (T) |
114 |
82 |
12 |
Warp crimp (c1) |
9.80% |
8.51% |
13 |
Weft crimp (c2) |
11.54% |
10.00% |
14 |
Reed width (RW) |
41.0 in. |
39.6 in. |
15 |
Cloth width (B) |
35.5 in. |
36 in. |
16 |
Warp yarn diameter (d1) |
7.31 mils |
7.63 mils |
17 |
Weft yarn diameter (d2) |
7.31 mils |
7.02 mils |
18 |
Beta ratio (d2/d1) |
1 |
0.92 |
19 |
Fabric Thickness (G) |
14.62 mils |
14.66 mils |
20 |
Fabric Weight (W) |
3.6041 oz/sq.yd. |
2.5913 oz/sq.yd. |
21 |
Fabric Weight (W1) |
12.2 gsm |
87.9 gsm |
22 |
Warp cover factor (K1) |
11.84 |
9.38 |
23 |
Weft cover factor (K2) |
11.43 |
7.45 |
24 |
Fabric cover (Kc) |
0.6597 |
0.5131 |
25 |
Fabric quality index (FQI) |
0.7229 |
0.5285 |
26 |
Warp weight factor (w1) |
2.42 |
2 |
27 |
Weft weight factor (w2) |
2.33 |
1.46 |
28 |
Cloth weight factor (W) |
1.04 |
1.37 |
29 |
Weight factor ratio (w1/w2) |
0.7588 |
0.7486 |
30 |
Linear Yd./ lb (Y) |
4.5 |
6.17 |
31 |
Effective yd/lb (BYT) |
18,219 |
18227 |
Classification |
|||
1 |
Fabric weight class |
Light (L4) |
Light (L3) |
2 |
Average count class |
Medium (M2) |
Medium (M2) |
3 |
Warp setting class |
close |
open |
4 |
Weft setting class |
close |
open |
5 |
Fabric setting class |
close |
open |
6 |
Fabric face class |
equal |
warp |
7 |
Fabric thickness class |
Medium Thick |
Medium Thick |
8 |
Fabric group |
7 |
7 |
9 |
Fabric condition |
Grey |
Grey |
Sr. No. |
CHARACTERISTIC |
EXAMPLE (5) |
EXAMPLE (6) |
|
|
|
|
1 |
Variety |
Sheeting (26s) |
Sheeting (26s) |
2 |
Material |
Cotton X Cotton |
Cotton X Cotton |
3 |
Weave |
Plain |
Plain |
4 |
Warp yarn Number. (N1) |
32s (Ne) |
24.5s (Ne) |
5 |
Weft yarn Number. (N2) |
21.5s (Ne) |
30s (Ne) |
6 |
Average count (Na) |
26.0s (Ne) |
26.8s (Ne) |
7 |
Reed count( R ) |
36s (Stockport) |
40s (Stockport) |
8 |
Pick wheel (P) |
33 (Teeth) |
37 (Teeth) |
9 |
Ends / in. (n1) |
40 |
44 |
10 |
Picks / in. (n2) |
36 |
40 |
11 |
Threads / sq. in. (T) |
76 |
84 |
12 |
Warp crimp (c1) |
9.09% |
8.11% |
13 |
Weft crimp (c2) |
11.11% |
10.00% |
14 |
Reed width (RW) |
44.4 in. |
63.8 in. |
15 |
Cloth width (B) |
40 in. |
58 in. |
16 |
Warp yarn diameter (d1) |
6.33 mils |
7.23 mils |
17 |
Weft yarn diameter (d2) |
7.72 mils |
6.54 mils |
18 |
Beta ratio (d2/d1) |
1.22 |
0.9 |
19 |
Fabric Thickness (G) |
14.05 mils |
13.71 mils |
20 |
Fabric Weight (W) |
2.2146 oz/sq.yd. |
2.3370 oz/sq.yd. |
21 |
Fabric Weight (W1) |
75.1 gsm |
79.2 gsm |
22 |
Warp cover factor (K1) |
7.07 |
8.89 |
23 |
Weft cover factor (K2) |
7.76 |
7.3 |
24 |
Fabric cover (Kc) |
0.4608 |
0.4965 |
25 |
Fabric quality index (FQI) |
0.4607 |
0.5029 |
26 |
Warp weight factor (w1) |
1.25 |
1.8 |
27 |
Weft weight factor (w2) |
1.67 |
1.33 |
28 |
Cloth weight factor (W) |
0.7573 |
0.7468 |
29 |
Weight factor ratio (w1/w2) |
0.75 |
1.35 |
30 |
Linear Yd./ lb (Y) |
6.5 |
4.25 |
31 |
Effective yd/lb (BYT) |
19,767 |
20,703 |
Classification |
|||
1 |
Fabric weight class |
Light (L3) |
Light (L3) |
2 |
Average count class |
Medium (M3) |
Medium (M3) |
3 |
Warp setting class |
open |
open |
4 |
Weft setting class |
open |
open |
5 |
Fabric setting class |
open |
open |
6 |
Fabric face class |
Weft |
Warp |
7 |
Fabric thickness class |
Medium Thick |
Medium Thick |
8 |
Fabric group |
7 |
7 |
9 |
Fabric condition |
Grey |
Grey |
Conclusions
1. Classification based on aesthetic aspects of fabrics is subjective and may vary from person to person.
2. Classification based on objective assessment is reliable, as it is backed by actual test results or figures arrived at by the use of appropriate formulae, since it is verifiable.
3. Classification is recommended for i) Fabric weight, ii) Average Count, iii) Warp set, iv) Weft set, v) Fabric set, vi) Fabric face, vii) Fabric thickness, viii) Fabric Group.
This method of fabric classification may be universally adopted by different Standards organizations, Manufacturers and Traders for the benefit of Consumers.
4. While Average Count is adopted for taxation purposes, fabric weight is adopted for costing purposes. But, it is preferable to adopt effective length/unit weight of fabric for costing purposes, since fabrics are mostly sold by linear measure.
5. In the case of Technical textiles, it is necessary for the proper classification of fabrics on functional basis: as such, the classification suggested in the present paper may be invariably adopted here also.
Appendix
The following formulae are used in calculating the various characteristics given in the paper:
1 |
Na = T/ (w1+ w2) |
Where |
2 |
R = n1 / (1+ c2) |
Na = Average count |
3 |
P = n2 / (1+c1) |
T = Sum of Threads / sq.in. |
4 |
n1 = R(1+c2) |
w1 = Warp weight factor |
5 |
n2 = P(1+c1) |
W2 = Weft weight factor |
6 |
T = n1 + n2 |
R = Reed count (Stockport) |
7 |
c1 = 1-(n2/P) |
P = Pick wheel (Teeth) |
8 |
c2 = 1-(n1/R) |
n1 = Ends/inch |
9 |
RW = B(1+c2) |
n2 = Picks/inch |
10 |
B = RW/ (1+c2) |
c1 = Warp Crimp |
11 |
d1 = 35.8063/√N1 |
c2 = Weft Crimp |
12 |
d2 = 35.8063/√N2 |
B = Cloth Width, in. |
13 |
β ratio = d1/d2=√N1/N2 |
RW = Reed Width, in. |
14 |
G = d1+d2 |
d1 = Warp yarn diameter, mils |
15 |
W = 0.6857[w1(1+c1)+w2(1+c2)] |
d2 = Weft yarn diameter, mils |
16 |
W' = 33.90608 W |
G = Fabric thickness, mils |
17 |
K1 = n1/√N1 |
W = Fabric Weight, oz/sq.yd. |
18 |
K2 = n2/√N2 |
w1 = Fabric Weight, gsm |
19 |
Kc = [(K1/27.93)+(K2/27.93) - (K1+K2)/780] |
K1 = Warp cover factor |
20 |
FQI = (K1+K2)/32.2 |
K2 = Weft cover factor |
21 |
w1 = n1/N1 |
Kc = Fabric Cover |
22 |
w2 = n2/N2 |
FQI = Fabric Quality Index |
23 |
w = W/(w1+w2) |
w = Cloth Weight factor |
24 |
BY = 576/W |
Y = Linear yd/lb of fabric |
25 |
Y = BY/B |
Y' = Linear meters/kg of fabric |
26 |
BYT = (BY)T |
BYT = Effective yd/lb of fabric |
27 |
BMT = 2.01629 BYT |
BMT = Effective meters/kg of fabric. |
28 |
Y' = 2.01629 Y |
|
29 |
1mil = 1/1000 in. = 0.0254 mm |
|
30 |
1mm = 1/1000 m = 39.37 mils |
|
31 |
1 inch = 2.54 cm |
|
32 |
1metre = 1.0936 yd |
|
33 |
1lb = 453.6 g |
|
34 |
1oz = 28.35 g |
|
References:
- Muniswamy D V, Hand Book of Cotton Fabrics, (Under Preparation).
- Muniswamy D V, Rayon Fabrics.
- Muniswamy D V, Know Your Fabrics.
- Muniswamy D V, Classification of Fabrics A New Approach, Vasana, Vol. 1, 2006.
- Graham Clark W A, Clarks Weave Room Calculations 3rd Edition, 1949.
- Ball H J, Engineering Design of Textile Structures, 1960-61.
- Louis I Parts I & II, Textile Fabric Design Tables.
- Robinson, A.T.C, and Marks R, Woven Cloth Construction, Reprinted 1973.
About the Author:
The author is the former Principal in GSKSJJ Institute, Bangalore and a Visiting Professor, ATM, BU, CCC, Bangalore.
To read more articles on Textile, Industry, Technical Textile, Dyes & Chemicals, Machinery, Fashion, Apparel, Technology, Retail, Leather, Footwear & Jewellery, Software and General please visit https://articles.fibre2fashion.com
To promote your company, product and services via promotional article, follow
this link: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/services/article-writing-service/content-promotion-services.asp
Comments